US-Nepal and India: Trilateral Relationson Global and Regional Strategic Perspective

Authors

  • Vijay Jayshwal School of Law, Kathmandu University, Kathmandu, Nepal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56405/dngcrj.2017.02.01.10

Keywords:

Hard Powers, Diplomatic Deficit, Chindia, Foreign Policy, NAM

Abstract

In the first section of paper, author has tried to clarify the indispensable and indivisible history of foreign policy of India with Nepal. Although Nepal’s foreign policy was always measured with comparing with our neighbouring nation as like Sino-Nepal relations will have the four basic characteristics with ‘c’ – cooperation, competition, confrontation and conflict. The concept of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) must be recognized and furnished by the foreign policy of Nepal. India is our strategic partner since time immoral. Nepal’s foreign policy is always been guided by the foreign policy of India and we shall see some similarities between these two countries foreign policy. India is revising their regional policy nowadays. They are also reviewing their regional involvement since 1947. A recent report says that “Non Alignment 2.0: A Foreign and Strategic Policy for India in the Twenty First Century’,a future policy of India must becentred on three “core objectives”: “To ensure that India did not define its national interest or approach to world politics in terms of ideologies and goals that had been set elsewhere; that India retained maximum strategic autonomy to pursue its development goals; and that India worked to build national power as the foundation for creating a just and equitable world order.

The second section of paper will illustrate the West eyes on East and our non- parallel rate of economic growth and benefit of Nepal from India’s growth. In the U.S.A. strategic guidance released in January 2012 has said that USA has shifted its strategic interest and priorities from the Atlantic to the Pacific, including the East and South Asia where these two giants are being situated. “U.S economic and security interest are inextricably linked to developments in the arc extending from the Western Pacific and East Asia into the Indian Ocean region and South Asia, creating a mix of evolving challenges and opportunities. Accordingly, while the US military will continue to contribute to security globally, we will of necessity rebalance toward the Asia- Pacific region” India is reformulating her bilateral ties with US and also ties with China to walk in line with changing scenario of world politics. We are secured in the sense that US have never shown her interest in Nepalese soil directly but have been played with Indian card. Nepal also needs to reformulate its bilateral ties with US independently keeping our strong relation with India.

The last section of paper will reconsider the possibility of Nepal’s further development and presence in some of Forums where India is taking lead. Such as, in SAARC, Indian diplomat J.N. Dixit has written that “time has come for the SAARC not shy away from becoming a forum for discussion on political issues which afflict then countries in the region” This forum shouldn’t limit to trade and co-operation in this regional level but most be favourable platform to discuss each country internal political conflicts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chakrabarti, S. (2012). India’s regional policy making in post-cold war setting (p. 408). Kolkata: Institute of Foreign Policy Studies, University of Calcutta.

Chandler, C., Zainulbhai, A. (2013). Reimaging India: Unlocking the potential of Asia’s next superpower (1st Ed.). New York: McKinsey & Company.

Chaturvedy, R.R., & Malone, D.M. (2012). A yam between two boulders: Nepal’s foreign policy caught between India and China. In Malone, D.M. Sebastian von Einsledel & Suman Pradhan (Eds.), Nepal in transition: From people’s war to fragile peace (pp. 287-292). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, S.P. (2013). India and America: Redefining the partnership (1st Ed.). New York: McKinsey & Company.

Dabhade, M., Pant, H.V. (2004). Coping with challenges to sovereignty: Sino-Indian rivalry and Nepal’s foreign policy. Contemporary South Asia, 13 (2), 159-160.

Dixit, J.N. (2001). Indian Foreign Policy and its Neighbours. Gyan Publishing House, New Delhi, India.

Emmott B. (2008). Rivals: How the Power Struggle between China, India and Japan will shape our Next Decade? London: Penguin.

Ganguly, S. (2010). Structure and agency in the making of Indian foreign policy. ISAS working paper, no. 116 (p. 11).

http://pinpointpolitics.co.uk/can-non-alignment-2-0-be-the-future-of-indian-foreignpolicy/ accessed on 2014/08/04.

http://us.macmillan.com/indiasforeignpolicyandregionalmultilateralism/ArndtMichael accessed on 2014/03/04.

http://www.mofa.gov.np/en/nepal-china-relations-78.html accessed on 2014/03/04.

Kumar, R. (2008). India as a foreign policy actor-normative redux. Centre for European Policy Studies, working document No. 285 (p. 26).

Lal, C.K. (2011). Living with dissonant neighbours. The Republica, May 02, 2011.

National Planning Commission and Institute of Foreign Affairs (2013). From a buffer towards a bridge: Nepal’s new Foreign Policy Agenda (p. 1).

National Planning Commission and Institute of Foreign Affairs (2013). From a buffer towards a bridge: Nepal’s New Foreign Policy Agenda (p. 1).

Rajagopalan, R., & Sahni, V. (2008). India and Great Power: Strategic imperatives, normative necessaries. South Asian Survey, 15 (2), 7.

Rao, N. (2014). Indian foreign policy in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. Available on https://www.indianembassy.org/archives_details.php?nid=1743 visited on 2014/08/05.

Ray, B. (2014). The evolving India-U.S. strategic relationship: A Compendium of Articles and Analyses. Available on http://www.comw.org/pda/0603india.htmlvisited on 2014/08/05.

Sahni, V., Rajagopalan, R. (2008). India and Great Power: Strategic imperatives, normative necessaries. South Asian Survey, 15 (2),7.

Shah, A. (2011). Understanding diplomacy. The Republica, April 18,2011.

Shrestha, B.N. (2000). Boundary of Nepal (in Vernacular). Kathmandu: Bhumichitra Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Sucharithanarugse, W. (2009). The concept of human security extended Asianizing the paradigm (pp. 49-61). New York: United Nation University.

Wainwright, A.M. (1995). Regional security and paramount powers: The British Raj and independent India. In Chetan Kumar and Marvin Weinbaum (Eds.), South Asia approaches the millennium (p. 43). Boulder: Westview.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-30

How to Cite

Jayshwal, V. (2017). US-Nepal and India: Trilateral Relationson Global and Regional Strategic Perspective. Dera Natung Government College Research Journal, 2(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.56405/dngcrj.2017.02.01.10

Issue

Section

Articles